[Solved] Major Hazards Without Federal

[Solved] Major Hazards Without Federal

Address each of the following questions related to federal-state-local collaboration during
disasters.
1. Why should there be national goals and strong federal direction, as during the period of
“creative federalism,” or greater flexibility for state and local officials to target funds and
efforts where they feel there is the greatest need?
2. What would happen if the federal role in emergency management was simply reduced to
providing financial support?
3. How likely is it that state representatives will address the state’s major hazards without
federal encouragement?
4. What are the advantages of developing local capabilities to reduce hazards? How likely is
it that local officials will address risks to life and property without outside funding and
support? 

Need help with your assignment? Hire Premiumessaytutor.com for quality assignment help and get Get 15% discount on your first order
Our experts will take care of your assignment no matter the deadline!
Use the following coupon
"SAVE15"

Order Now