1.Click on the following links below:

a.Careers in Human Services

b.New York Human Services Nonprofit and Charities

2.one-page journal entry answering the following:

a. Choose one of the professions/careers that closely matches your interest from the Careers in Human Services link above

c. compose about the requirements you will need to be the professional in Human Services you have chosen.

d. From the list of the “New York Human Services Nonprofits and Charities.” choose one that interests you.

e. Explain why you are interested in that organization, the communities it serves and how you would use your chosen profession/career in that organization to the benefit of the people they serve.

Note: DO NOT COPY AND PASTE FROM THE INTERNET. SUMMARIZE IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Submit your assignment in a Word document for grading and feedback. 

In this video Recovery expert Marvin D. Seppala, MD, joins host William C. Moyers to discuss the disease of addiction in easily understandable terms: the role of dopamine in the brain’s reward center; effects of alcohol and other drugs on the brain, liver, heart and mental health; genetic and other risk factors for addiction.

After viewing the video clip. Submit a full one-and-a-half page reflection of what was shared on how addiction affects the body and the mind. Your efforts must be double spaced, use a 12-point font, and a separate cover page. 

 

Develop a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following criteria:

• Slide 1:  Title Page.
• Slide 2:  SBIRT overview – Describe the history of SBIRT, the SBIRT process and how it is used in clinical practice settings using US research articles.
• Slide 3:  Case Presentation – Do not include patient identifying information but include demographics i.e. age, gender, race/ethnicity, chief complaint, social history, family psychiatric history, psychiatric history, and risk factors.
• Slide 4:  Screening Tool used – Describe the screening tool, validity (sensitivity and specificity), scoring information, and citation.  Your patient’s score and the interpretation of the patient’s score are required.
• Slide 5:  Brief Intervention – How was the Motivational Interviewing process applied and shared your client’s score and need for behavioral changes.  Discuss the four stages of motivational interviewing and provide details of how the techniques were used.  A transcript of your encounter with the patient conducting the OARS technique is expected.  Discuss the roadblocks used or those avoided to obtain full points. Discuss the patient’s stage of change before the intervention was performed
• Slide 6:  Referral for Treatment – Describe the 3 referrals for follow-up treatment plan.  Include the name, address, and telephone number of the local large organization (MUST BE IN MIAMI area)  Be specific with the department where necessary.
• Slide 7:  Evaluation of the process – Share the patient’s outcome and your evaluation of the SBIRT process.
• Slide 8:  References –5 references.  7th Edition APA format.  Include Screening Tool authors.Formatted and cited in current APA style 7 ed  with support from at least 5 academic sources which need to be journal articles or books from 2019 up to now. NO WEBSITES allowed for reference entry. Include doi, page numbers, etc. Plagiarism must be less than 10%.

Submission Instructions:

• The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per current APA guidelines and 10 slides in length, including the title and references slides. For presentation clarification, students need to include the presenter’s notes.

 SBIRT Rubric 

 SBIRT Overview :

 Describes the definition, history and current US evidence surround the use of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment in the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner role. Specifically addressed the disease as it relates to  the following populations: an adult.
 

 Screening Tool :

 The screening tool used was discussed in detail. The tool used was highly specific and sensitive, based on current US evidence, to the population, ethnicity, age, and gender of the client. The raw score and its interpretation were discussed in detail. 

 Brief Intervention :

 Provides a summary of the four stages of the motivational interview: Engaging, Focusing, Evoking, and Planning with detailed descriptions for each area. Includes how the OARS technique was used during the session, roadblocks and the client’s stage of change. 

 Referral :

 Provides a detailed list of three or more referrals to local (MIAMI AREA), large organizations for allied health, psychologist, medical, and other interdisciplinary support. Includes a timeline for follow-up appointments. 

 Conclusion :

 The presentation is concluded by tying the content back to the opening with a dynamic 25 words or less close. Transitioned into so the audience was ready for it. 

  

Students much review the case study and answer all questions with a scholarly response using APA and include 2 scholarly references. Answer both case studies on the same document and upload 1 document to Moodle.

Case Study 1 & 2 topics change every semester. Topics will be determined at due time for this semester

The answers must be in your own words with reference to the journal or book where you found the evidence to your answer. Do not copy-paste or use a past students work as all files submitted in this course are registered and saved in turn it in program.

Turn it in Score must be less than 25 % or will not be accepted for credit, must be your own work and in your own words. You can resubmit, Final submission will be accepted if less than 25 %. Copy-paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated. Please see College Handbook with reference to Academic Misconduct Statement.

All answers to case studies must-have reference cited in the text for each answer and a minimum of 2 Scholarly References (Journals, books) (No websites)  per case Study

  

Discussion 2

Discuss how a comprehensive clinical assessment presents a unique opportunity for intervention in the psychotherapeutic context.

Two scholarly sources references are required unless stated otherwise by your professor. 

The student provides a substantive response to the discussion question or topic 

Here are the categories of the new discussion rubric:

Initial Post relevance to the topic of discussion, applicability, and insight. (20%)

Quality of Written Communication Appropriateness of audience and words choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Grammar, spelling, punctuation. (20%)

Inclusion of APNA standards essentials explored in the discussion as well as the role-specific competencies as applicable.(10%)

Rigor, currency, and relevance of the scholarly references. (Use articles that are below 5 years). (20%)