Part 1: Conduct an initial self-assessment in communication wherein you self-evaluate according to The 7 Competencies of Effective Communication, presented by Engleberg and Wynn (2015): know thy self; connect with others; determine your purpose; adapt to the context; select message content; structure the message; express the message. As you write your responses in the narrative section, draw upon the information you have learned from your studies of the lessons, text, and assigned exercises to demonstrate how your present understanding of course content informs your self-assessment. You may consider using the questions Engleberg and Wynn (2015) ask in their graphic (as prompts for each competency reflection). Finally, assess your level of skill by circling or highlighting the appropriate descriptor: excellent, good, average, or weak.

Part 2: In light of your self-assessment, provide both an overview of your goals and develop an improvement plan that includes measurable outcomes or “goals” that you may revisit near the end of this course. You should have at the very least two goals with a measurable plan for each detailed. Further, consider a way that you will track your progress.

Required Format and Process

Download and complete each area of the self-assessment table by writing in sentence format; submit it to your faculty by the due date. Be sure to address all rubric criteria.

 Reply these words with 200 words each one and reference

Title: Influencing Healthcare Through Advocacy: A Personal Journey and how to 

create effective interdisciplinary organizational and systems leadership in the care of clients in diverse care settings.

Introduction

Learning the ropes of policy, politics, and advocacy is a transformative endeavor with the ultimate goal of influencing healthcare and broader social agendas that profoundly impact human health. In this discussion, I become an advocate to effect change in healthcare, reflecting the purpose of mastering these skills.

Advocacy for Universal Healthcare Access

My journey into healthcare advocacy began when I witnessed the struggles of a close friend, Emily, who was burdened by exorbitant medical bills due to a chronic illness. Fueled by empathy and a desire for equitable healthcare, I embarked on a path to advocate for universal healthcare access.

            1.         Policy Analysis and Research: I started by immersing myself in healthcare policy analysis and research (Smith et al., 2018). This included studying existing healthcare systems worldwide to understand their strengths and weaknesses. Through this, I gained the knowledge needed to advocate for an inclusive healthcare system.

            2.         Community Engagement: Recognizing that community support is crucial for advocacy, I organized town hall meetings, awareness campaigns, and grassroots movements to engage citizens in discussions about healthcare access (Gitterman, 2017). By fostering a sense of shared responsibility, we encouraged individuals to join the cause.

            3.         Legislative Advocacy: I proactively engaged with lawmakers, presenting data and personal stories to advocate for policy changes aimed at expanding healthcare access. Collaborating with like-minded organizations and lobbying for healthcare reform became integral to my advocacy efforts (Berkowitz & Wolff, 2020).

            4.         Patient-Centered Advocacy: To amplify the voices of patients like Emily, I encouraged them to share their experiences and struggles. These personal stories resonated with policymakers and underscored the urgent need for healthcare reform (Travis, 2019).

            5.         Building Coalitions: Recognizing the power of partnerships, I formed coalitions with healthcare professionals, advocacy groups, and community leaders. These alliances strengthened our advocacy efforts and allowed us to pool resources and expertise (Berkowitz & Wolff, 2020).

Conclusion

My journey in healthcare advocacy reflects the purpose of mastering policy, politics, and advocacy skills – to influence healthcare and broader social agendas. Through policy analysis, community engagement, legislative advocacy, patient-centered efforts, and strategic partnerships, I worked towards the vision of universal healthcare access.  This it highlights the profound impact advocacy can have in shaping the future of healthcare and improving human health on a broader scale.

2. I have learned to value the crucial part that politics, lobbying, and policy play in determining the healthcare landscape throughout my work as a nurse. One specific instance stands out as proof of the effectiveness of advocacy in changing health care and more general societal goals.

I recently came across a critical problem involving patient safety and drug delivery while working as a clinical nurse in a big urban hospital. It became clear that our current system had a history of mistakes, especially when it came to high-risk drugs. This finding is confirmed by Pozzi’s (2023) study. Concerns over near-miss occurrences and sporadic medication mistakes had been raised among the nursing team, and it was obvious that something needed to be done to safeguard the safety of our patients.

Seeing the gravity of the situation, I started an advocacy journey to deal with it. The first step was acquiring information and proof to support my claims. I carefully recorded incidences and reviewed the available research on the best medication administration methods. I used this knowledge to report my findings to the hospital’s quality improvement committee.

Gaining support for the suggested improvements required active participation from stakeholders, as evidenced in the study by Beaudry et al. (2019). I formed a multidisciplinary task force with other nurses, pharmacists, and doctors to enhance pharmaceutical safety. We held regular meetings to discuss solutions, examine policies, and implement actual initiatives.

The adoption of a barcode scanning technology for medicine administration was one of the main campaign initiatives. I thought this technology had a lot of promise for our hospital because it had successfully reduced prescription errors in other healthcare settings. I did a ton of study on the advantages and affordability of this approach, and I made a strong argument to hospital executives.

The practice of advocacy went beyond hospital boundaries. I spoke with representatives from pharmaceutical companies, went to patient safety seminars, and connected with industry experts. I was able to present creative solutions by keeping up with developments in medicine administration technologies and best practices.

I worked with the hospital’s nursing leadership to write a policy proposal describing the implementation strategy for the barcode scanning technology as the advocacy efforts picked up steam. This comprised a thorough rollout schedule, workflow modifications, and employee training. I made sure that frontline nurses’ involvement was included in the policy because their viewpoints were crucial for forming its actual implementation.

The conclusion of these campaign efforts was the effective introduction of barcode scanning technology for drug administration. The new approach greatly decreased prescription errors and near-miss instances, improving patient safety and boosting nursing staff trust.

This example demonstrated the significant influence lobbying may have on medical outcomes. I was able to have an impact on an important component of patient care by identifying a problem, obtaining data, enlisting stakeholders, and promoting creative solutions. It strengthened my resolve to be a proactive advocate for the welfare of my patients and the larger community, and it confirmed my belief in the ability of advocacy to bring about constructive change in the healthcare industry.

 reply with 200 words and reference

When discussing Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research we think of three distinct yet interconnected research paradigms employed across various disciplines. These approaches differ in philosophical foundations, data collection techniques, and analytical methods while sharing a joint commitment to rigorous research. It is essential to draw upon recent scholarly resources published within the past three years to elucidate the differences and similarities among these methodologies.

Quantitative research is characterized by its emphasis on the numerical data and the statistical analysis to get conclusions and make generalizations (Creswell & Creswell, 2017). Researchers in quantitative studies employ structured surveys, questionnaires, and experiments to collect data from a sizable sample size. Statistical techniques like regression analysis and hypothesis testing are commonly utilized to analyze quantitative data. The hallmark of quantitative research lies in its objectivity and the ability to establish causal relationships and trends within a population.

Qualitative research, on the other hand, focuses on understanding the depth and nuances of human experiences and perspectives (Creswell & Creswell, 2017). Qualitative researchers gather non-numerical data through interviews, observations, and open-ended surveys. The analysis involves thematic coding and content analysis to identify patterns, themes, and meanings within the data. Qualitative research offers a rich and holistic exploration of a phenomenon, often uncovering insights that quantitative methods may miss.

Mixed methods research represents an integration of both quantitative and qualitative approaches within a single study (Creswell & Creswell, 2017). The mixed methods is used by researchers to take the strengths of both paradigms to provide a more comprehensive understanding of their research questions. Data collection and analysis can occur sequentially or concurrently, with findings integrated at various stages. This approach enhances the triangulation of results and allows researchers to explore complex research questions from multiple angles (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2018)

While these three research methodologies exhibit fundamental differences, they also share similarities. All of the three approaches adhere to systematic research methods, are committed to ethical conduct (American Psychological Association, 2020), and require rigorous data analysis. Additionally, they contribute to advancing knowledge within their respective fields, each offering unique insights and perspectives.

In conclusion, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research studies are distinct but complementary approaches to research. They differ in data collection, analysis, and philosophical underpinnings while sharing a dedication to sound research practices. Researchers choose these methodologies based on their research questions and objectives, recognizing that each offers valuable contributions to the pursuit of knowledge.

 ot all research is created equally.  Your textbook discusses what to look for in an article to determine if it is reliable and good research (if you can trust it!) from an academic perspective. One way is to find reliable journals you know have a strong peer review process for all submitted manuscripts. With this in mind: 1. Select a Journal you enjoy and report the following:   

• The Journal Name (and link to the website)
• The review process (Is it refereed? Is there an editor decision? Is the length of time the review may take reported?)
• The Impact Factor (Find the journal’s impact factor and explain what it means)
• Your decision on whether or not research articles published in the journal are acceptable to use for an academic literature review and why. 

It is also important for you to understand how research is created. This will give you a greater understanding of the research process and research reports or articles.  2. Let’s begin with research questions and hypotheses. Please use the material in Chapter 4 of your textbook on writing research questions and hypotheses for the second discussion question this week:

• Although research questions and hypotheses should be the result of an exhaustive literature review, for the purposes of this question, you may use your logic to connect these two variables:  Age and Attention.     
  • Using these variables write an example of a good general research question and a good testable hypothesis.

   omplete the following readings from your textbook, Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach:

• Chapter 4: Getting Ideas for Research
• https://youtu.be/1VtA-8PMty0
• https://youtu.be/Nu-xEOau1ec

MUST BE 300 WORD 3 SCHOLARY SOURCES 

 Search the web for ethical standards in the Human Services field, then find at least 5 Scriptures describing how we should treat others and care for them. Compare and contrast the Human Service ethics standards with biblical standards. How are they alike? How are they different?