The overview of the first three modules of this course will lead you into an exploration of
various educational philosophies.  Traditional philosophies, modern and post-modern
philosophies, as well as educational theories of transformation and transmission will all be
studied along with their corresponding personalities.  This assignment will give you the
opportunity to organize the essential components of each of these major educational philosophies
and to compare these components against one another.  The result will be an invaluable tool in
your educational toolbox for years to come.
INSTRUCTIONS
Using the Gutek textbook, the Jerry Falwell library, and any other research databases to complete
the empty white cells in the accompanying template. Your responses in each column should
reflect the beliefs about that category according to the specific philosophy for that section. This
will assist you in comparing the various philosophies. Ensure that the major principles of each
philosophy are clarified. Key words, phrases, and short sentences will suffice. Lengthy
paragraphs are unnecessary. The textbook aligns with the matrix chronologically, so you will
find the information as you read through the book. Much of this information is clear in the text.
For a few of the philosophies near the end of the matrix, however, you may need to make some
inferences based on the information you read. The following list is to help you consider what
should be written in each column.
 Metaphysics = What is reality/truth? What is purpose and meaning in life?
 Epistemology = Is it possible to know reality/truth? If so, how?
 Axiology = What values should be developed in education?
 Learner’s Nature = What is the role of the learner? What is the human condition?
Good? Bad? Neutral? What learner factors should be considered in education?
 Teacher’s Role = What is the most effective approach the teacher should take?
 Curricular Focus = What content is most important?
 Methodology = What pedagogical strategies are most effective?
 Criticisms = What do opponents of this philosophy/theory say about it? 

books used:  

Gutek, G. (2014). Philosophical, Ideological, and Theoretical perspectives on Education (2 ed.) Pearson. ISBN: 9780132852388.

Liberty University Custom: Slavin, R. E., & Schunk, D.H. (2021). Learning Theories. (3rd ed.). Pearson. ISBN: 9780136956334.

My internship is with united way 211 I Provide emotional support, suicide prevention and crisis intervention on Inland SoCal Crisis Helpline,founded in 1968. Inland SoCal Crisis Helpline is a project of Inland SoCal 211 and the Inland SoCal United Way. 

PLEASE CHOOSE A SUICIDAL PERSON TO HELP.

it’s a PowerPoint need to have a Summary of each slide

I am attaching the other parts that will help you do this part.

External Factor Evaluation (EFE)

 In this opening paragraph, explain what the significance is regarding an External Factor Evaluation for an organization (see Table 7). This explanation must include the rankings 1 to 4 as well as the weighting 0.00 to 1.00. This paragraph must have 5 to 6 academic sentences with 2 to 3 current scholarly sources. In addition, explain the results of your EFE analysis regarding the total weighted score. Indicate whether the value you obtained was greater than the average (2.5), less than or equal to and what this means. You should include Table 7, which will include the matrix of the evaluation of the 20 external factors.

Table 7

External Factor Evaluation Matrix

Opportunities

Weight

Rating

Weighted score

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

Threats

Weight

Rating

Weighted score

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

Totals

1.00

#.##

 The following are my eight factors (i.e., 4 opportunities, 4 threats).

Four Opportunities. Provide a minimum of 5 to 6 academic sentences explaining why you chose these four opportunities to improve the total weighted score, whether the score was above or below the 2.50 total weighted score. You must have at least 4 to 6 current scholarly sources to validate your claims. An example of an opening sentence to this paragraph should read: The following four opportunities were identified from my External Factor Evaluation (see Table 8): (a) xxxx, (b) xxxx, (c) xxxx, and (d) xxxx.

First Selected Opportunity. Begin sentence here and explain why you chose this opportunity. 

Second Selected Opportunity. Begin sentence here and explain why you chose this opportunity. 

Third Selected Opportunity. Begin sentence here and explain why you chose this opportunity. 

Fourth Selected Opportunity. Begin sentence here and explain why you chose this opportunity. 

Four Threats. Provide a minimum of 5 to 6 academic sentences explaining why you chose these four threats to improve the total weighted score, whether the score was above or below the 2.50 total weighted score. You must have at least 4 to 6 current scholarly sources to validate your claims. An example of an opening sentence to this paragraph should read: The following four threats were identified from my External Factor Evaluation (see Table 8): (a) xxxx, (b) xxxx, (c) xxxx, and (d) xxxx.

First Selected Threat. Begin sentence here and explain why you chose this threat. 

Second Selected Threat. Begin sentence here and explain why you chose this threat. 

Third Selected Threat. Begin sentence here and explain why you chose this threat. 

Fourth Selected Threat. Begin sentence here and explain why you chose this threat. 

Table 8

Four Opportunities and Four Threats Factors 

#

Opportunities factors

1

2

3

4

Threats factors

1

2

3

4

1. How do you feel about managing conflict? Note any apprehensions that you may have, their root and how you plan to overcome them?
2. As a new leaders, who would you go to for assistance in managing conflict in your desired educational setting?
3. Of the approaches to conflict management identified in Chapter 5 of Gorton & Alston (2022), which do you feel are the most effective?  Why? 

1. Assume you are the leader of this institution, how will you approach this situation?