[Solved] Confirmed Please Use

[Solved] Confirmed Please Use

Hi, so I am looking for someone to handle my quiz real quick. it has 45 questions on and it time. I need at least 80% score and I need to have someone confident in marketing and business in general to handle it for me. My budget is 45$.

I wont accept your bid if you won’t check the topics we have covered in class and confirm that you can handle random questions from most of the topics. If you have confirmed the various topics please start your bid with “confirmed”.

Please use our class textbook here –  https://sso.strayer.edu/idp/SSO.saml2?SAMLRequest=fVJRT8IwGPwr%2B3lQ0mNkCCECMJKmHogy%2BmtB%2FSpGtrv1bl3zuGRnnhqen17r7rtSPkjXZsGsPerOE9Aobkq9EGWXcwJtEbZjkqZIY3gCwIVk%2Fvl6zIKHPeBiusJv8klxUcEXxQ1pBkMR%2BT111vUO0Gw6sKegWUgg7FddmX26qQVX8oBwIKWvX7tBxek%2BQZPLbKMWmNWjlihIXBwE1oIVqUKa3Skm5oxcqKDegLSebtbZThoVPtQ3DI8hzRZhg8P4DPQMZcSZfX9WN2DF%2BQZPqbcGYNxgZ8Df5DCXhaL%2F88lOCNi3jmg6pxGo4ueWNl1JC5vcu7PZ7WIuUCO1TCjkcdUnQkWf2UeKOMVObtcn%2FbEwnZ3WazSleP9YZMRkdv1vXhJxcSjvL%2FxNHp4R%2FaEYv5ymolDsmt9Q0PlxMcESXTXUdlrbtBBSa0xWltP2ceeIAxCT4CySenkeffa%2FIN&RelayState=https%3A%2F%2Ficampus.strayer.edu%2Fsaml_login%3Fdestination%3D%252F

[Solved] Fellow Student Please

[Solved] Fellow Student Please

Compare the themes of the Social Realists to the Impressionists by using the work of two artists.  Students should examine the impact of Marx and Baudelaire on their topics. You must post and image of their work and discuss it (don’t use one shown in your textbook or already posted by a fellow student).

please look through the file

between 400-500 words each, and include an image either taken by yourself or found online. You should explain how your chosen image relates to the specific question given for this unit discussion (listed below). You MUST cite the source of information and/or images you find using Chicago style.  Your post should be free of spelling and grammatical errors. These postings will be used to assess your understanding of materials and processes as well as the social, political, and religious role of art within each specific unit.

[Solved] Mgt Slp 3 Mgt

[Solved] Mgt Slp 3 Mgt

MGT SLP 3 

MGT 420 Power Influence and Persuasion 

CONFLICT AND NEGOTIATION

For the Module 3 SLP you will be applying the concepts you learned in the background materials regarding conflict and negotiation to a situation from your own personal experiences. Carefully review the background materials regarding types of conflict, causes of conflict, negotiation stages, and conflict management styles. It is important to first understand these comments from the background readings before starting this assignment.

Once you have thoroughly reviewed the background materials, think of a situation in the workplace where a conflict erupted and management had to intervene and some type of negotiation was involved. Then write a three page paper addressing the following four questions, and make sure to cite at least one of the required background readings for each of your four answers :

  1. Was this conflict functional or dysfunctional?
  2. What was the cause of the conflict? Use the terms from the background materials in your answer—for example, was the conflict a result of interpersonal issues, a specific task involved, due to inter-organizational issues, etc.
  3. Of the five approaches to conflict management outlined in Shearouse (2011) or Bauer and Erdogan (2011), which approach most closely describes the approach used by management to resolve this conflict?
  4. Did the negotiations involve integrative or distributive bargaining? What stages of negotiation did management go through, and did these stages match the five stages discussed in Bauer and Erdogan (2011)?

Please see attached files for complete assignment details.

[Solved] Mgt Case 3 Mgt

[Solved] Mgt Case 3 Mgt

MGT CASE 3 

MGT 420 Power Influence and Persuasion

CONFLICT AND NEGOTIATION 

Case Assignment

Once you have finished reviewing the background materials, take a look at this following article and think about how the concepts from the background materials apply to this fictional case:

Cliffe, S. (1999). Can This Merger Be Saved? Harvard Business Review, 77(1), 28-44. [EbscoHost]

Then write a 5-page paper addressing the following questions:

  1. Do you think this conflict that Nick Cunningham faces is functional or dysfunctional? Explain your reasoning, and cite Bauer and Erdogan (2011) or Luthans et al. (2015) in your answer.
  2. What is the source of this conflict? Use the terminology from Bauer and Erdogan (2011), or Luthans et al. (2015) in your answer. For example, is this conflict a result of relationship/interpersonal issues? Or from tasks/roles? Other?
  3. Of the five styles of conflict management discussed in Shearhouse (2011) or Bauer and Erdogan (2011) which one do you think would be the best approach for Nick Cunningham to take?
  4. What other advice would you give Nick Cunningham based on the concepts discussed in any of the background readings?

Please see attached files for complete assignment details.

[Solved] 100 Pts Case

[Solved] 100 Pts Case

ASSIGNMENT #3: Case Study 1- “The Passive Principal” (Case 17)

Case Studies: Read the assigned case study and respond to the questions. Questions are found at the end of the case scenario. Response should be one page or less (double – space and utilize font size 12.)

The Passive Principal:   Questions #1, #3 and #5 (100 pts).

Case study can be found under week 4 modules.  

[Solved] 21St Century Summarizes

[Solved] 21St Century Summarizes

ASSIGNMENT #1:Joel Barker LEADERSHIFT video

Joel Barker has studied & developed materials relative to “PARADIGMS” for a number of years. His video, “LEADERSHIFT – 5 lessons for leaders in the 21st century”, summarizes much of his work relative to challenges faced by todays leaders.

ASSIGNMENT:

1. Go online to NET to: “Joel Barker, LEADERSHIFT video” & review. List key points.

2. Read Monograph: “Good to Great in the Social Sectors” by Jim Collins.

2. Summarize key points and how you would apply these in seeking “GREATNESS”? 

Assignment #2: “Toxic Boss” 

“Toxic Boss” Scenario: List characteristics of the worst boss/leader to whom you have been exposed or can imagine, and then summarize your feelings and emotions. Secondly, make another list of characteristics of the most effective boss/leader to whom you have been exposed.   Summarize your feelings and emotions . The related rubric is attached below.

[Solved] Demonstrate Critical Thinking Skills

[Solved] Demonstrate Critical Thinking Skills

Case Brief 2 

Download and read the case study for Starbucks, McDonald’s, or Best Buy from the 12 Most Popular Cases supplement. Click the three lines (contents) in the top, left-hand corner to view all of the cases.

The format for the case brief should be double-spaced, 12 pt. font, 1-inch margins, with assignment and student information in a header or title page. Case briefs should be 4-5 pages of content. Case briefs should also be submitted as Word Document (.doc, .docx) file formats. 

From the Syllabus:

The content of the case briefs will be graded according to your ability to: (1) document your analysis of the case situation (provide evidence), (2) demonstrate critical thinking skills through sophisticated reasoning, and (3) demonstrate awareness of the complexities of the subject matter. The case briefs will also be graded with respect to writing style. This includes the acceptable use of language, voice, and organization in addition to content. A written communication assessment rubric will be used to determine your grade. *Please refer to the rubric passed out in class and/or in the rubric module.

Each case write-up should have three components: Analysis, Recommendations and Justifications. In the write-up, don’t simply repeat case facts or company history. Rather, use case facts to define the problem, and then provide thorough and well thought out recommendations along with suggested implementation actions. Usually two to three main recommendations are adequate. Provide justification for your recommendations by describing how your recommendations will potentially solve the organization’s problem/issue.

There should be a balanced discussion of the three components, and a logical connection between each of the three components. While your recommendations are the most important part of the written assignment, you should make a case for why you think your recommendations will “fix” the organization’s issues. Your grade will be lowered if you do not discuss either of the three components sufficiently, or there are few connections between the components.

Some suggestions for preparing the case briefs:1. Identify one to three key issues in the situation. Every situation has a number of issues and your task is to identify the major issues that you will focus your analysis on.

2. Use Strategic Management concepts to show how the major issues cause the symptoms of ineffectiveness (or effectiveness) observed in the case. Here you should be theorizing about why things are happening rather than merely describing what is occurring. This is important because if you can figure out why the situation is developing as it is then you can begin to understand what aspects of the situation are going to be responsive to management action.

3. Present your recommendations. Be sure they follow logically from your analysis and treat problems not symptoms. Questions that you might answer include: What course of action do you recommend in this situation? How will this be implemented? What are the expected outcomes? What are the inherent risks and challenges? What aspect(s) of the problem(s) will remain unsolved? Be as specific as you can. Individual Case Briefings are due at the beginning of the corresponding class session.

[Solved] Pdfdownload Edl 604 Stanford

[Solved] Pdfdownload Edl 604 Stanford

DropBox for Analysis of Stanford Leadership Research Assignment

Read the Stanford Leadership Research study commissioned by the Wallace Foundation (available in this week’s module) . EDL 604 Stanford Leadership Study.pdfDownload EDL 604 Stanford Leadership Study.pdf

Organize your analysis using the headings below, and Include the following components in your analysis of the Stanford Leadership Study: Developing Successful Principals-

INTRODUCTION: Provide an overview of the authors/organization who conducted this research and why they initiated the study. What was their intent in conducting the research and reporting their findings? From where was the data collected? Why is this information timely, relevant, and critical in the field of education today?

KEY FINDINGS: Provide a detailed overview of each of the key findings reported in the study. In addition, for each of the findings, reflect upon your own experiences/opinions, as a teacher, administrator, (or whatever your role may be) relative to each of the reported findings. (There are four key findings. Address each of these in this section of your analysis.)

PERSONAL RESPONSE TO FINDINGS:  Based upon your own experiences, explain your own perceptions related to the most significant needs of principals (relative to the findings in the study). Explain. Be specific with examples, and prioritize these needs. 

FINAL REFLECTION: Reflect upon the study itself and its impact on your understanding of the role & expectations of today’s educational leaders. In your own experiences, describe the degree to which you have experienced working with or observing principals who did (or did not) possess the qualities and/or skills described in the Stanford Leadership Research.

This assignment is worth 100 points. Pay attention to the scoring rubric embedded into this assignment below. Please use the template provided in the module to complete this assignment. Limit your submission to a 1-2 page limit, not including your cover page or reference pages.

You should provide your findings in a 1-2 page limit paper excluding a cover page and reference page.  Remember to follow APA format, which includes double spacing, in-text citations, and a reference page. This assignment is worth 100 points. Pay attention to the scoring rubric embedded into this assignment below.

[Solved] Something Surprising

[Solved] Something Surprising

Please read and respond to at least two of your peers’ initial postings. In your responses, you may consider the following questions:

  • How do your answers compare to those of your peers?  How are they similar or different?
  • What is something surprising about your peers’ responses?
  • What additional information can you add to help support the responses of your peers?
  • Ask a clarifying question to your peers to continue the conversation about this case.
  • Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

[Solved] Data Table Additionstep 8

[Solved] Data Table Additionstep 8

INSTRUCTIONSPlease find the full requirement attached.

1.             Summary:

To apply all acquired knowledge in the last Project Assignments to create a Database Scheme. For this project, the ERD is provided to you.

Deliverables:

Required Software:

Lab Steps:

Step 1: Analyze the ERD for a student information system provided below. Be alert for the specifications provided for: 1) Entities, 2) Attributes, 3) Primary Key, and 4) Relationships.  You will need to have a clear understanding for these components to create your database using MySQL.

Step 2: Create a New Database in MySQL, Produce SQL File, Drop Table

Step 3: Include the following commands at the tops of your scripts:

Step 4: Create Tables in your database

Step 5: Designate Data Types. Update the data type as needed to enforce the domain constrain of the data. This needs to be completed for every column for all tables.

Step 6: Column Constraints Designation.

Step 7: Data Table Addition

Step 8: Executing your SCRIPT

Step 9: Upload your work

Please find the full requirement attached.