I need this in 600 words. I also need multiple resources to answer the questions, with in-text citations of all resources used. Resources must also be within the last 5 years.

Instructions:

Choose 2 of the following topical areas to address:

1. How do you integrate theory and science into EBP?

2. What are effective leadership characteristics? 

3. What is Systems Thinking and how does it relate to Leadership in Advanced Practice?

4.  In  Zaccagnini, the reader is presented with brief summaries of 18 theories of nursing.  Choose one that may underpin your nursing practice and describe why that theory supports your practice or choose another theory/model that you currently use or would like to implement in your setting. 

5. Does theory  relate or contribute anything to daily practice?  In what ways might you use theory in practice? 

6.  In what ways might you use theory in practice? 

7. Discuss the benefits, concerns, and challenges of the systems approach as it relates to the multiple dimensions of a health care system. Please share an example of systems thinking or transformational leadership that you have seen in practice.

8.  What leadership styles do you think you will most likely adopt as a DNP graduate, when engaged in a leadership role? Why?

9. Do you face conflict or avoid it?  How do you gain experience in feeling comfortable addressing conflict in the workplace?

Middle-range theories are very important in clinical research because they enable research experts to integrate theories and empirical research. The theories contain different related ideas which focus on limited reality dimensions in the nursing practice (Smith & Liehr, 2018). They are developed and integrated into the nursing practice to improve the research and practice processes. They ensure that the evidence collected from the research provides enough guidance in developing the theories that support the improvement of nursing practices. However, external and internal criticism is widely applied in the area to criticize and evaluate the middle-range theories ensuring that they effectively address the problems in the healthcare sector.

            The evaluation of middle-range theories using the internal criticism approaches helps determine their importance, historical applications, purpose, and classifications of the theoretical summaries. It ensures that they are effective and can be used to address the different problems affecting people. It is always difficult to test middle-range theories, and criticism must be provided to ensure they fit the criteria and requirements required to address the problems affecting patients and communities (Wayne, 2021). Internal criticism focuses on important concepts within the theory to ensure that the accuracies of the theories are easily understood using experiments and other applications within healthcare settings. It includes studying the philosophical developments of the theory, models, conceptual framework, propositions, domains, processes, paradigms, and meta-paradigms. Evaluating the theory helps validate its effectiveness in bringing out positive results when used in nursing practice. The learning outcomes explored in the weekly discussion clarified how internal criticism is widely used in evaluating middle-range theories in clinical settings.

            External criticism is applied in the evaluation process of the middle-range theories to ensure that they are authentic and genuine. Researchers engaged in evaluating the theories help determine that the solutions and interventions they offer in the clinical practices are accurate. Historical studies of the theories provide a clear understanding of the successes and mistakes caused by applying the theory in clinical care and other processes within the healthcare sector (Khoshnood et al., 2018). Theoretical works and processes used in developing the theories are evaluated to determine whether knowledge development is effective and beneficial to nursing practices. In this case, the criticism is extended to ensure that the evaluation of the theory helps determine how it can be used to improve health worldwide and not parts of the population. Based on the weekly discussions, external criticism in the evaluation of theories is an important process because it helps determine the relationships of the theories to people, nursing practices, and health outcomes.

 200 words and one scholarly reference  APA style 7th edition 

 Covid-19 Vaccination Rates and Behavior Models

1. What are some examples that you saw used to drive an increase in Covid-19 vaccination rate? (social media, news outlets, company policy etc) Why were some more successful than others?
2. Do you have any new ideas or variations on existing ideas that you think could have driven increases in US Covid-19 vaccination rates?

Imagine you are applying for a job as a human resources (HR) professional in the health care industry. Refer to your research on job responsibilities and expectations completed in the Week 1 assignment and analyze the role of human resource management in health care to see if your personality, interests, and organizational skills are a good fit.

Write a 350- to 525-word cover letter as though you are applying to one of the roles you researched. Address the following in your cover letter: 

Identify the HR position in the healthcare industry that you are applying for.

Describe why you would excel in that role.

Identify the organizational skill sets required for this position and describe how you demonstrate them. Share how your current skills are transferable to this position.

Explain the importance of HR management in the healthcare industry and how you personify that based on your past experience.

For this week, you will need to complete the “game” and the patient scenario at this link:

https://de.ryerson.ca/games/nursing/treatment-plans/#/video/ _

_

Once completed, you’ll need to write a 3-paragraph document that outlines what you’ve learned about ADHD screening, monitoring, and treatment plan. Be sure to use the APA format and provide at least two references.