Incorporating NASW Code of Ethics, especially the Code’s preamble, actively engage in discussion based on the following questions. 

1. With your reading on the Code of Ethics, and especially the Code’s preamble and last section in mind, what do you think would most surprise the general public about social work’s primary mission?  Why? Do you think that if the general public were exposed to the Code it would change their image of social work and social workers?  If so, how? 
2. When you first began to think about your own future as a social worker, did your vision match the vision that seems to be at the heart of the Code of Ethics?  What is one thing in the reading we have done for class thus far that has had an impact on your vision of post-MSW social work?
3. Why do you think that there is such limited knowledge and understanding among the general public about the breadth and depth of social work practice?  Do professional social workers bear any responsibility for this limited knowledge and understanding? Can we do anything to change this?
4. How would you incorporate NASW Code of Ethics in your policy practice?
5. How you plan to advocate for social welfare policy reform in your future practice?

300-350 words

Describe changes in students’ social cognition (perceptions and understanding of others) as they develop. Elaborate on the age level you expect to teach. What will you do to nurture positive peer relationships in your classroom?

Ormrod, J. E., & Jones, B. D. (2012). Essentials of educational psychology: Big ideas to guide effective teaching.

please add citations in . 

Describe a particularly effective or ineffective classroom environment you experienced in the past. Compare the features of this environment to the research on effective classroom environments described in the Module 8 reading. What implications do you draw from your experience and the research to inform your future practice? What considerations will be most important in the classroom environment for the age group you expect to teach? 

Ormrod, J. E., & Jones, B. D. (2012). Essentials of educational psychology: Big ideas to guide effective teaching.

1.The Furkids and ASPCA commercials both aim to appeal to viewers’ emotions in order to persuade them to take action. The Furkids commercial primarily uses humor and cuteness to engage the audience. This appeal is effective because it grabs the viewers’ attention and creates a positive association with the brand. The use of humor also helps to create a memorable and enjoyable experience for the audience.

On the other hand, the ASPCA commercial takes a more serious and emotional approach. It uses images of neglected and abused animals, accompanied by a somber soundtrack and a voiceover that highlights the suffering of these animals. This appeal is effective because it evokes strong emotions of sadness and empathy in the viewers. By showing the harsh reality of animal cruelty, the commercial aims to motivate viewers to take action and support the organization.

Both appeals are effective in their own ways. The Furkids commercial appeals to viewers’ desire for entertainment and enjoyment, while the ASPCA commercial appeals to their sense of compassion and empathy. The effectiveness of these appeals depends on the individual viewer and their personal preferences.

Personally, I find the ASPCA commercial more persuasive. The emotional appeal used in the commercial is powerful and evokes a strong response. The images of suffering animals and the heartbreaking stories shared in the voiceover create a sense of urgency and a desire to help. While the Furkids commercial is entertaining and enjoyable, it does not have the same level of emotional impact. Ultimately, the ASPCA commercial effectively communicates the seriousness of the issue and compels viewers to take action.

 2. The ASPCA commercials are well known, I have seen the AD on and off since I could ever remember.  Adding depressing music, photos and videos made me feel guilty. (Pathos)  As the viewer I myself felt the need to take part in their organization.  The ASPCA uses the shelter animals as a Visual Rhetoric, showing what pain the animals are going through.  I however the Furkids video had my vote.  I liked the somewhat ‘cheesy’ aspect to it.  It had more of a mom and pop vibe.  After reading the comments under the video, i found out that the guy made the video himself from top to bottom (even playing the guitar).  I personally find the smaller elements and ques to be more invoking. (Ethos)

     Both AD’s were effective because of my strong soft spot for animals.  The ASCPA had a very strong undertone of depression, almost like if I were to not help.  The animals were doomed one again making the viewer feel guilty.  The highlight was the pictures of the animals.  I didn’t like how they were offering T-Shirts to people who donated.  That extra money could have been used to help in other ways. 

     Of the two, Furkids had the much more upbeat video.  Showing happy and well looked after animals that need a new home.  The guy leading the video was playing with the cats himself.  Also as a business they didn’t look to be asking for handouts.  That’s why i found Furkids to be effective.

     The choice between the two commercials comes down to personal preferences and values.  Someone may respond more to the emotional, guilt-inducing approach of the ASPCA, while others may like the positive tone of Furkids.  Both organizations aim to achieve the same goal, which is to help animals in need.