[Solved] CRJU 3320: Criminal Investigations: Case Brief

/in /by

CRJU 3320: Criminal Investigations
Case Brief Instructions
You will write two case briefs in this course. Each will review a US Supreme Court case that
focused on criminal investigation procedures. Case brief writing instructions may be found
here: https://www.cengage.com/resource_uploads/downloads/0324595743_156000.pdf.
The link also contains a sample brief here your reference. Make sure to add a final section of
analysis. This section is where you show me that you understand the importance and
relevance of the case to criminal investigations. What would our system look like if the case
had not occurred? How did it change procedures? Analyze the case in terms of its impact
on the criminal justice system. This analysis section should be at least half of the second
page.
Briefs should be two full pages detailing case facts with one-half of the second page
consisting of your analysis. They will be due at 11:00pm on the due dates listed in the
syllabus. Each brief is worth 50 points. Late briefs will not be accepted. The list of cases
from which to choose follows these instructions.
Formatting Guidelines:
Ø Briefs must be:
o typed,
o two full pages containing the case brief components with one-half of the
second page consisting of your analysis,
o single-spaced,
o 12 point font, with
o 1” margins all around.
o All assignments must be submitted in .doc, .docx, or .rtf format. Others will not
be accepted. I cannot grade what I cannot read/open.
Cases that you may choose to brief:
Terry v. Ohio (1968) https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/392/1
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/384/436
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/367/643
Tennessee v. Garner (1985) https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/471/1
Graham v. Connor (1989) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/490/386/case.html
Week v. US (1914) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/232/383/case.html
Carroll v. US (1925) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/267/132/case.html
Ashcraft v. Tennessee (1944)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/267/132/case.html

[Solved] Week 5 Discussion

/in , , /by

Week 5 Discussion (Rubric)

Review the resources available on the CISA.gov website using the link provided in this week’s reading. Select any 2 resources provided on the site, research the information and resources provided, and share what you learn in the discussion. Engage with other students regarding what they find on the site.

Discussion Requirements

For all discussions, the primary response is due by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time. 

The primary response must be at least 200 words in length and fully address the topic, demonstrating critical thinking and understanding. Each student must then also post a minimum of two responses to other students in the discussion by Sunday night at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time. 

Each peer response must be at least 50 words in length and substantively engage with the other student’s original post, continuing the discussion in a professional manner. If at any time information or material is brought in from an outside source or website, it must be properly cited following APA 7th edition guidelines and a full reference must be provided.

[Solved] Behavior Change

/in /by

For this paper, you will choose a behavior of yours or someone else’s that you would like to change through operant conditioning. Examples include overeating, getting a child to clean up his room, or stopping your dog from chewing up your shoes. Answer the following questions in the form of a 2-3 page paper:
• What is the behavior that you are trying to change? Describe the behavior.
• How would you apply operant conditioning to change this behavior? Would
you use positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, positive punishment
or negative punishment?
• Is your goal to increase or decrease the behavior?
• What will you use as reinforcers or punishers? Are they primary or secondary
reinforcers/punishers?
• If you choose to reinforce the behavior- What schedule of reinforcement will
you use? What pattern of responding would you expect this schedule of
reinforcement to produce? OR
• If you choose to punish the behavior- What problems might result from using
punishment to change the behavior? What steps would you take to address
these problems?
• What would you expect to happen to the behavior if the reinforcer/punisher
were removed?
• Does research support your method of changing the behavior? Discuss the
empirically-supported methods of changing your selected behavior. Cite at least 2 peer-reviewed journal articles.

[Solved] Political Ideologies

/in /by

Paper details

Instructions: This essay is comprised of two components. The essay must be at least 1000 words overall. Please include a works cited page as well.

Part One:

  1. Begin by completing the following political ideology quizzes:
  2. Advocates for Self Government a libertarian website: www.theadvocates.org/quiz
  3. Pew Research Center for People & the Press: www.people-press.org/typlogy/quiz
  4. Next, analyze the results. Do you believe that these quizzes accurately measured your ideological leanings to the right or the left? Why or why not?

Part Two:

•    Some people argue that there are no significant differences between the two major parties.  Backing up your perspective with appropriate sources, what are the major differences and similarities in the views of the Democratic and Republican parties (e.g., this review of party platforms, 1856-2016 www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/conventions/party-platform-evolution/)?  What are the primary areas of difference between contemporary Democrats and Republicans? How are the two parties similar? What are the consequences of these patterns for voters and election outcomes?  For policy outcomes?

Essays are automatically submitted to SafeAssign. Work that SafeAssign identifies as having more than a 10% rate of similarity after quoted material and small matches (10 words or less) are excluded will not be read and will receive a grade of 0.

[Solved] MIS 540: Risk Assessment and Mitigation

/in /by

Risk assessment and mitigation are critical parts of an enterprise risk management plan. Review information from the NIST article in this week’s reading and write a 3-4 page APA-formatted paper summarizing the article. Focus your paper on the following key areas:

  • Risk tolerance and risk appetite
  • Impacts of threats and vulnerabilities on enterprise assets
  • The creation of risk registers outlining the likelihood and impact of various threats

Risk response and monitoring

“Expert Custom Essay Writing Services – Get the Grade You Deserve”

/in /by

The Importance of Custom Writing Services

Custom writing services have become increasingly popular in recent years, as more and more students and professionals turn to these services to help them with their writing needs. Whether you are a student in need of a research paper, a professional looking to write a business proposal, or a creative writer looking to publish a book, custom writing services can help you achieve your goals.

What are Custom Writing Services?

Custom writing services are online companies that provide writing assistance to individuals and businesses. These services are typically run by professional writers who have the experience and expertise to create high-quality content on a variety of topics. Some of the most common types of custom writing services include:

  • Research paper writing
  • Business proposal writing
  • Book writing
  • Article writing
  • Blog writing
  • Resume writing
  • Proofreading and editing

Benefits of Using Custom Writing Services

There are many benefits to using custom writing services. Some of the most notable include:

  • High-quality writing: Custom writing services are run by professional writers who are experts in their field. This means that the content they produce is of a high standard and is well-written.
  • Time-saving: Custom writing services can save you a lot of time as they can handle the writing for you. This means that you can focus on other things and still get the writing done that you need.
  • Customized content: Custom writing services can tailor the content to your specific needs. This means that you can get content that is tailored to your target audience and that is written in the style and tone that you want.
  • Affordable: Custom writing services are often more affordable than hiring a professional writer on a freelance basis. This means that you can get high-quality writing at a fraction of the cost.

How Custom Writing Services Work

Custom writing services work by connecting you with a professional writer who will then create the content that you need. The process typically starts with you filling out an online form with the details of the writing that you need. This includes the topic, the length of the content, and any specific instructions or requirements that you have.

Once the form is submitted, the custom writing service will match you with a writer who is best suited to your needs. The writer will then start working on your content and will keep in touch with you throughout the process to make sure that you are happy with the progress.

Once the content is complete, you will be sent a draft for review. You can then provide feedback and make any necessary changes. Once the content is finalized, it will be sent to you in the format that you need, such as a Word document or a PDF file.

Conclusion

Custom writing services are a great way to get high-quality writing done without having to spend a lot of time and effort. These services are run by professional writers who are experts in their field, which means that you can trust that the content they produce is of a high standard. Whether you are a student in need of a research paper, a professional looking to write a business proposal, or a creative writer looking to publish a book, custom writing services can help you achieve your goals.

 

[Solved] Engage Workshop Summary Forum

/in , , /by

Engage Workshop Summary Forum

Engage Week will replace the Week 4 class meetings in graduate and doctoral courses.

Students will be assigned an Engage Week workshop based on the course in which they are enrolled. In these workshops, students will be provided new and exciting opportunities to:

  • Collaborate across courses within their program

  • Gain exposure to new resources in their industry

  • Refine key skills in areas relevant to their program

In place of the Live Session, students will earn both Attendance and Participation credit by submitting a summary in the ENGAGE Workshop Forum. The summary should be at least 250 words in length and makes a connection between the workshop and the course content.

To receive credit for attendance and VCS/Participation, post your Engage Workshop Summary response by Sunday at 11:59 p.m.

Note: We recommend using a word processor such as Microsoft Word, Google Docs, or any other software when working on your discussion answer. After it has been completed – copy and paste your work into the forum.

[Solved] Week 4 Participation/VCS Submission

/in , , /by

An online student who does not participate in the Virtual Class Session (VCS) can earn attendance and participation points for the lecture only by watching the VCS recording and submitting a summary of the VCS class recording by the assigned deadline.  Online Student VCS Instructions

Onsite students who have obtained faculty permission can view the VCS recording and write the required summary to obtain participation credit only, not attendance credit, by following the Onsite Student VCS Recording directions.

VCS summaries need to be submitted before the next live class session. For example, if your class meets on Thursday evenings at 6 pm, your prior week’s class summary must be submitted by 5:59 pm.

[Solved] Food Resilience Plan for Arzaville

/in , , /by
Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Refer to the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric under the Settings icon above for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.

 

Food Resilience Plan for Arzaville [WLO: 2] [CLOs: 2, 3]

Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read Chapter 4 in your course textbook.

Imagine that you are a resident of Arzaville, a community whose characteristics are described below. You have come together with your neighbors for a special meeting to devise a management plan for helping the community become more resilient and sustainable in terms of its food production by 2050. A community that is resilient is able to recover quickly from events like drought or storms. By increasing its own food production, Arzaville can also reduce its food miles—the distance that imported food must travel. By making its food production more sustainable, Arzaville can help ensure that its residents’ food needs are supplied for generations to come, without placing undue harm on the local environment in the process.

Fortunately, you have all attended the meeting with the knowledge that you have gained from your readings in this course. Now it is time to put your thinking cap on and get to work! Your ideas should consist of one or more of the following elements (some suggestions may apply to both categories):

  • Food resiliency measures (e.g., building vertical farms in the city center to ensure that urban residents can have access to fresh, organically grown produce).
  • Food sustainability measures (e.g., phasing out use of organic pesticides in favor of companion planting and other organic methods).

This week’s discussion will take place in an online app called Tricider. There, you will be able to post your ideas for plan components and also share pros and cons of different proposals during the week. Finally, you will be able to vote on the three components that you think the plan should include.

For directions on how to use the Tricider app, please review the Tricider Help Guide Download Tricider Help Guide. In Tricider, you will be expected to do the following:

  • Post at least two separate and entirely original ideas. Do not duplicate ideas already posted by your peers.
    •  Include your full name for each one.
  • Post at least six different pros and six different cons for your classmates’ proposed ideas (12 in all).
  • Vote on what you feel are the top three ideas in the list.
    • Do not vote before Friday, so that you can vote from the full collection of student ideas.

You must complete the three tasks above to receive full credit for this discussion.

Please note: You are welcome to post questions and comments to this board for your instructor; however, this discussion board does not have any posting requirements of its own, and no additional credit will be given for posts made here.

In this discussion area, your instructor will post the following:

  • The Arzaville description you will be using for this activity.
  • The link you will be using to access Tricider for this activity.

[Solved] Fall Prevention in inpatient hospital setting

/in /by

Assessment 5 Instructions: Synthesis of Evidence Substantiating a Practice Gap

MUST FILL OUT THE EVIDENCE TABLE TEMPLATE ATTACHED

ALSO ATTACHED IS A SAMPLE PAPER PROVIDED BY THE PROFESSOR WITH HEADINGS NEEDED

Start with a one-paragraph introduction that includes a brief overview of the gap in practice.

Critical Review of Literature

Provide a critical review of each of the articles you included in the evidence table. Then, for each article, write a one-paragraph critique that addresses the following:

Provide a one-sentence overview of the main point of the article.
Be sure each article is correctly formatted in APA format. The author’s last name and date should be used to identify each article, rather than the article title.
Provide the research questions and discuss the research methodology used.
If the research question is not specified, provide the aim of the study instead.
Analyze the theoretical basis and/or conceptual framework used in the study, if described in the study.
Critically appraise the study using one or more of the following:
SORT [PDF].
Johns Hopkins [PDF].
What is GRADE?
Report on the study findings and propose a possible application this article could have to your own project topic.

Synthesis of Literature

Now it is time to summarize the information, reach conclusions, and link the resources that you found. In other words, a synthesis is akin to combining the parts to make a whole. This is accomplished by asking yourself, what is the main point(s) that the selected research articles have in common? For the second part of the assessment, provide a brief synthesis (1–2 paragraphs) of the information you have collected from the five articles you chose.

Thus, following the MEAL plan, you will write a topic sentence for this section that makes a main point, which is supported and explained by all of the articles you selected. If you devote one paragraph to an entire article, you are creating an annotated bibliography, which is helpful for your personal use to keep track of your articles, but it is not a synthesis of the literature. This skill will be important for you to master before you create your project charter, which must be written professionally, yet succinctly.

In your synthesis of the literature:

Following the MEAL Plan, synthesize the gap in practice using all five articles to clearly identify the gap in practice.
Identify any unanswered questions and areas where further research is needed.
The paragraph should be in your own words and should not include quotes.

Writing Feedback

An important part of writing at the doctoral level is using feedback to improve your writing skills. Look back at the feedback you have already received on previous assessments in this course, and write a short conclusion to this paper that addresses the following:

What kinds of writing feedback did you receive on your previous assessments? Are there any specific writing skills you may need to work on?
How do you plan to improve your writing in these areas? What resources do you think would be useful to you in your journey to become a better academic writer?
How will implementing these changes move your work closer to one or more of the writing quality indicators identified in the Writing Feedback Tool?

Grading Criteria
Your assessment will be graded using the following scoring guide criteria:

Identify at least five recent research articles that provide information or insight about a specific clinical practice gap.
Summarize recent research articles about a specific clinical practice gap by completing an evidence table.
Provide a critical review of all chosen research articles, including methodology, research questions, theoretical basis, and findings.
Synthesize the evidence using the MEAL plan format.
Explain how the integration of writing feedback improves the assessment.
Produce text with minimal grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

cf_evidence_table_template-1

1-dec-new-course-5_synthesis-of-evidence-substantiating-a-practice-gap